A nice review from Aussie blogger Belle. From the review:
Even for someone who isn’t a massive non-fiction reader, I found this book to be extremely interesting, engaging and yes, even enjoyable. I came away feeling more informed, more fired up and frankly, more touched than I thought I would be. Because what this book highlights most of all is that, at its very root, this argument is one of love and compassion – and it cannot be won without those things.
This conservative case was buttressed by my fellow conservative writers – learned, decent, honest intellectuals like Jon Rauch and Bruce Bawer and Dale Carpenter and John Corvino and many others. We were no Democrats.
For the record, I’ve been a registered Democrat for decades. Nonetheless, the full piece is well worth reading.
There’s a nice profile of John’s marriage-debate book (with Maggie Gallagher) at The American Conservative. From the review:
Debating Same-Sex Marriage is an important book that lays bare the philosophical arguments for and against the legalization of same-sex marriage. Although I am partial to Gallagher’s arguments, Corvino’s position is well argued and more in tune with the times.
Corvino’s “hope [is that] this book invites an ongoing dialogue that is thoughtful, rigorous, sensitive, and productive”; he’s successful on all counts, and the result is an essential and accessible read for any interested parties.
I was honored to share a panel with Naomi Goldberg, Denise Brogan-Kator, and Steve Sanders at the University of Michigan’s Ford School, to talk about the DOMA challenges now at the U.S. Supreme Court. Read the PrideSource story on the panel here.
My new website is still being refined; thanks for your patience. Soon my old column archives will be uploaded. Meanwhile, please note my upcoming speaking appearances at Salisbury University, the University of Michigan, and Bowling Green State University.
PRESS RELEASE: With the country roughly evenly divided on same-sex marriage, the issue is a flashpoint in the November election. President Obama has endorsed marriage equality, the Democratic Party has included it as part of its national platform, and voters in four states (ME, MD, MN, and WA) will consider ballot initiatives on the issue. Meanwhile, the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) is mobilizing to defeat these initiatives and roll back marriage rights in other states.
Professor John Corvino is intimately familiar with NOM’s arguments, having just published a book with NOM’s co-founder Maggie Gallagher. In the book, Debating Same-Sex Marriage (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012) he dismantles Gallagher’s position and makes a powerful case for marriage equality. Now, in a new series of nine short videos, he distills the arguments down to their core elements and makes them accessible to a wider audience. The videos are about 3 minutes long each, with a total running time of under a half hour.
Displaying Corvino’s trademark combination of logical precision, sensitivity and humor, the videos offer powerful rebuttals to familiar objections, such as “If gay marriage, why not polygamy?” and “Marriage by definition requires a man and a woman.” While dismantling the arguments one by one, Corvino also sets the stage for a more positive dialogue.
Corvino, also known as “The Gay Moralist” (for his longtime column of the same name), is chair of the Philosophy Department at Wayne State University in Detroit. He has spoken at over 200 university campuses on ethics, sexuality, and marriage. “My goal is to promote a more thoughtful conversation on these issues,” he says. “Moral concerns should be conversation-starters, not conversation-stoppers.”
These videos continue that conversation respectfully yet forcefully. Find them here.